![]() Some initial findings from me, if they are true at all: I'd like to know what you found interesting there, especially in comparison between 2 or 3 of the programs mentioned. Removal of converging lines and any skewed perspective automatically or manually.Removal of pincushion and barrel distortion automatically (lens profile) or manually.I am in no way associated with or sponsored by DxO, but last I checked a license costs about $80 and that pays for itself quickly in saved labor.Hello, do you find a difference in Geometry/Transformation functions between ![]() As a perfectionist I seek to make photographs that accurately portray the space I'm in and DxO ViewPoint II let's me fine tune a space exactly how it should look. I literally remember the exact moment I first stumbled upon it because it changed my workflow that much. For a more detailed Photoshop workflow visit my post on PT Lens ConclusionĬorrecting perspective in photographs felt like banging my head on the wall until I found DxO ViewPoint. I can then export JPG's out of Lightroom using the variety of presets I have if necessary. DxO ViewPoint II is the last step of my workflow right before saving back to Lightroom as a PSD or TIFF with layers intact. Yes, DxO also has modules for lens distortion, but I personally find them cumbersome and prefer the interface of PT Lens. After your general editing, always start with lens distortion and then correct perspective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |